Thursday, March 3, 2011

Alexander was not a cruel leader, he tried to be fair to his people, but often manipulated them. He was considered a "good leader" to many people because of the inspirational speeches he gave before battle. Alexander was also very selfish and wanted power badly. He risked many lives in doing this, he also earned a reckless reputation. He was allabout his ego risking his troops and his own life for power. He was dangerous in his ways and he caused many problems with other nations. Pericles was different he instead wanted to do the best for the people. He showed them this by caring and attempting to hear what the people had to say. Pericles was not as egotisticle and almost an odd ruler for that time period since he cared about his people so much. He was willing to listen and wanted to keep them safe. Without a doubt Pericles was a better ruler than Alexander, because of many reasons. Alexander might have been a good leader on the battle fields, with amazing strategies, but he was not ready to take care of his people

2 comments:

  1. You are definitely wrong about this. You should probably do more research because this daily is not that good. You should probably go and cry about not doing it correctly.

    Read this Article:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great

    ReplyDelete
  2. @wernsam14

    Your comment is not helpful; please see me and we can discuss the purpose of leaving comments on the blogs of our peers.

    @brian
    If you had to follow in the footsteps of what you describe as Alexander's "recklessness", would you perhaps consider him cruel? Do you think he was looking out for his soldiers? Why did they remain loyal to him?

    ReplyDelete